Virtual environment system for validating executable data using accelerated time-based process execution

ABSTRACT

A virtual environment system for validating using accelerated time-based process execution is provided. In particular, the system may generate a virtual environment using a virtual environment device, where the virtual environment is logically and/or physically separated from other devices and/or environments within the network. The system may then open a specified set of executable data within the virtual environment and perform a set of commands or processes with respect to the executable data. The set of commands or processes may be executed on an accelerated-time basis such that processes that would be executed on a longer timeline may be executed at a greater speed (e.g., a shorter timeline). In this way, the system may securely detect the presence of latent defects or issues that may arise from executing the code on a long-term basis.

FIELD OF THE INVENTION

The present disclosure embraces a system for secure execution of programcode using accelerated time-based process execution.

BACKGROUND

There is a need for a secure way to verify the safety of program code.

BRIEF SUMMARY

The following presents a simplified summary of one or more embodimentsof the invention in order to provide a basic understanding of suchembodiments. This summary is not an extensive overview of allcontemplated embodiments, and is intended to neither identify key orcritical elements of all embodiments, nor delineate the scope of any orall embodiments. Its sole purpose is to present some concepts of one ormore embodiments in a simplified form as a prelude to the more detaileddescription that is presented later.

The present disclosure is directed to a virtual environment system forvalidating using accelerated time-based process execution. Inparticular, the system may generate a virtual environment using avirtual environment device, where the virtual environment is logicallyand/or physically separated from other devices and/or environmentswithin the network. The system may then open a specified set ofexecutable data within the virtual environment and perform a set ofcommands or processes with respect to the executable data. The set ofcommands or processes may be executed on an accelerated-time basis suchthat processes that would be executed on a longer timeline may beexecuted at a greater speed (e.g., a shorter timeline). In this way, thesystem may securely detect the presence of latent defects or issues thatmay arise from executing the code on a long-term basis.

Accordingly, embodiments of the present disclosure provide a system forsecure execution of program code within a virtual environment usingaccelerated time-based process execution. The system may comprise amemory device with computer-readable program code stored thereon; acommunication device; and a processing device operatively coupled to thememory device and the communication device. The processing device may beconfigured to execute the computer-readable program code to import a setof executable code into a virtual environment instance; execute, withinthe virtual environment instance, one or more processes on the set ofexecutable code, wherein the one or more processes are executed on anaccelerated time basis; based on executing the one or more processes,perform validation of the set of executable code; process the set ofexecutable code using a data transformation algorithm to generate a datatransformation output; and store the data transformation output in anauthorization database.

In some embodiments, executing the one or more processes on theaccelerated time basis comprises determining an expected timeframe of anundetected issue within the set of executable code; and adjust atimeframe of executing the one or more processes based on the expectedtimeframe of the undetected issue.

In some embodiments, the undetected issue is a logic bomb.

In some embodiments, the computer-readable program code further causesthe processing device to receive a request from a user to execute asecond set of executable code; process the second set of executable codeusing the data transformation algorithm to generate a second datatransformation output; compare the second data transformation output toone or more entries in the authorization database; and validate thesecond data transformation output based on comparing the second datatransformation output with the one or more entries in the authorizationdatabase.

In some embodiments, the authorization database is an authorized hashdatabase, wherein comparing the second data transformation output to oneor more entries in the authorization database comprises detecting amatch between the second data transformation output and a cryptographichash value within the one or more entries in the authorization database;and based on detecting the match, authorizing execution of the secondset of executable code on a target computing system.

In some embodiments, the computer-readable program code further causesthe processing device to display a positive indicator to a user via auser interface, wherein the positive indicator indicates that the secondset of executable code is authorized to be executed on the targetcomputing system.

In some embodiments, the authorization database is an authorized hashdatabase, wherein comparing the second data transformation output to oneor more entries in the authorization database comprises determining thatthe second data transformation output does not match any of the one ormore entries in the authorization database; and automatically blockingexecution of the second set of executable code on a target computingsystem.

Embodiments of the present disclosure also provide a computer programproduct for secure execution of program code within a virtualenvironment using accelerated time-based process execution. The computerprogram product may comprise at least one non-transitory computerreadable medium having computer-readable program code portions embodiedtherein, the computer-readable program code portions comprisingexecutable code portions for importing a set of executable code into avirtual environment instance; executing, within the virtual environmentinstance, one or more processes on the set of executable code, whereinthe one or more processes are executed on an accelerated time basis;based on executing the one or more processes, performing validation ofthe set of executable code; processing the set of executable code usinga data transformation algorithm to generate a data transformationoutput; and storing the data transformation output in an authorizationdatabase.

In some embodiments, executing the one or more processes on theaccelerated time basis comprises determining an expected timeframe of anundetected issue within the set of executable code; and adjust atimeframe of executing the one or more processes based on the expectedtimeframe of the undetected issue.

In some embodiments, the undetected issue is a logic bomb.

In some embodiments, the computer-readable program code portions furthercomprise executable code portions for receiving a request from a user toexecute a second set of executable code; processing the second set ofexecutable code using the data transformation algorithm to generate asecond data transformation output; comparing the second datatransformation output to one or more entries in the authorizationdatabase; and validating the second data transformation output based oncomparing the second data transformation output with the one or moreentries in the authorization database.

In some embodiments, the authorization database is an authorized hashdatabase, wherein comparing the second data transformation output to oneor more entries in the authorization database comprises detecting amatch between the second data transformation output and a cryptographichash value within the one or more entries in the authorization database;and based on detecting the match, authorizing execution of the secondset of executable code on a target computing system.

In some embodiments, the computer-readable program code portions furthercomprise an executable code portion for displaying a positive indicatorto a user via a user interface, wherein the positive indicator indicatesthat the second set of executable code is authorized to be executed onthe target computing system.

Embodiments of the present disclosure also provide acomputer-implemented method for secure execution of program code withina virtual environment using accelerated time-based process execution,wherein the computer-implemented method comprises importing a set ofexecutable code into a virtual environment instance; executing, withinthe virtual environment instance, one or more processes on the set ofexecutable code, wherein the one or more processes are executed on anaccelerated time basis; based on executing the one or more processes,performing validation of the set of executable code; processing the setof executable code using a data transformation algorithm to generate adata transformation output; and storing the data transformation outputin an authorization database.

In some embodiments, executing the one or more processes on theaccelerated time basis comprises determining an expected timeframe of anundetected issue within the set of executable code; and adjust atimeframe of executing the one or more processes based on the expectedtimeframe of the undetected issue.

In some embodiments, the undetected issue is a logic bomb.

In some embodiments, the method further comprises receiving a requestfrom a user to execute a second set of executable code; processing thesecond set of executable code using the data transformation algorithm togenerate a second data transformation output; comparing the second datatransformation output to one or more entries in the authorizationdatabase; and validating the second data transformation output based oncomparing the second data transformation output with the one or moreentries in the authorization database.

In some embodiments, the authorization database is an authorized hashdatabase, wherein comparing the second data transformation output to oneor more entries in the authorization database comprises detecting amatch between the second data transformation output and a cryptographichash value within the one or more entries in the authorization database;and based on detecting the match, authorizing execution of the secondset of executable code on a target computing system.

In some embodiments, the method further comprises displaying a positiveindicator to a user via a user interface, wherein the positive indicatorindicates that the second set of executable code is authorized to beexecuted on the target computing system.

In some embodiments, the authorization database is an authorized hashdatabase, wherein comparing the second data transformation output to oneor more entries in the authorization database comprises determining thatthe second data transformation output does not match any of the one ormore entries in the authorization database; and automatically blockingexecution of the second set of executable code on a target computingsystem.

The features, functions, and advantages that have been discussed may beachieved independently in various embodiments of the present inventionor may be combined with yet other embodiments, further details of whichcan be seen with reference to the following description and drawings.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

Having thus described embodiments of the invention in general terms,reference will now be made to the accompanying drawings, wherein:

FIG. 1 illustrates an operating environment for the secure virtualenvironment system, in accordance with one embodiment of the presentdisclosure;

FIG. 2 illustrates a process flow for performing validation ofexecutable code using accelerated time-based process execution, inaccordance with one embodiment of the present disclosure; and

FIG. 3 illustrates a process flow for validating executable code usingan authorization database, in accordance with one embodiment of thepresent disclosure.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF EMBODIMENTS OF THE INVENTION

Embodiments of the present invention will now be described more fullyhereinafter with reference to the accompanying drawings, in which some,but not all, embodiments of the invention are shown. Indeed, theinvention may be embodied in many different forms and should not beconstrued as limited to the embodiments set forth herein; rather, theseembodiments are provided so that this disclosure will satisfy applicablelegal requirements. Like numbers refer to elements throughout. Wherepossible, any terms expressed in the singular form herein are meant toalso include the plural form and vice versa, unless explicitly statedotherwise. Also, as used herein, the term “a” and/or “an” shall mean“one or more,” even though the phrase “one or more” is also used herein.

“Entity” as used herein may refer to an individual or an organizationthat owns and/or operates an online system of networked computingdevices, systems, and/or peripheral devices on which the systemdescribed herein is implemented. The entity may be a businessorganization, a non-profit organization, a government organization, andthe like, which may routinely use various types of applications withinits enterprise environment to accomplish its organizational objectives.

“Entity system” as used herein may refer to the computing systems,devices, software, applications, communications hardware, and/or otherresources used by the entity to perform the functions as describedherein. Accordingly, the entity system may comprise desktop computers,laptop computers, servers, Internet-of-Things (“IoT”) devices, networkedterminals, mobile smartphones, smart devices (e.g., smart watches),network connections, and/or other types of computing systems or devicesand/or peripherals along with their associated applications.

“Computing system” or “computing device” as used herein may refer to anetworked computing device within the entity system. The computingsystem may include a processor, a non-transitory storage medium, acommunications device, and a display. The computing system may beconfigured to support user logins and inputs from any combination ofsimilar or disparate devices. Accordingly, the computing system may be aportable electronic device such as a smartphone, tablet, single boardcomputer, smart device, or laptop. In other embodiments, the computingsystem may be a stationary unit such as a personal desktop computer,networked terminal, IoT device, or the like.

“User” as used herein may refer to an individual who may interact withthe entity system to access the functions therein. Accordingly, the usermay be an agent, employee, associate, contractor, or other authorizedparty who may access, use, administrate, maintain, and/or manage thecomputing systems within the entity system. In other embodiments, theuser may be a client or customer of the entity.

Accordingly, the term “user device” or “mobile device” may refer tomobile phones, personal computing devices, tablet computers, wearabledevices, and/or any stationary or portable electronic device capable ofreceiving and/or storing data therein.

“Data transformation algorithm” as used herein may refer to a set oflogical and/or mathematical operations or processes that may be executedon a specified segment of data to produce a transformation output.Accordingly, in some embodiments, the data transformation algorithm maybe a cryptographic hash function or hash algorithm (e.g., MD5, SecureHash Algorithm/SHA, or the like) which, given a specified data input,produces a cryptographic hash output value (e.g., a fixed-lengthcharacter string).

“Virtual environment” as used herein may refer to a computingenvironment that may be physically and/or logically isolated from otherenvironments and/or computing systems within the network. “Virtualenvironment instance” as used herein may refer to a particularconfiguration of a virtual environment that may be created for a giventime period. Each virtual environment instance may have separatelyallocated resources, processes, system files, drivers, and applications.Accordingly, processes or code that may be executed within a virtualenvironment instance will only affect the state of the virtualenvironment instance.

“Malware” as defined herein may refer to executable code which may causethe execution of one or more unwanted or unauthorized processes on atarget computing system (e.g., deleting or corrupting files, modifyingdata, encrypting files, or the like). Accordingly, malware may includeviruses, worms, spyware, adware, or the like.

“Logic bomb” as used herein may refer to a specific type of malware thatmay execute unwanted or unauthorized processes upon detecting theoccurrence of certain specific conditions. Examples of such conditionsmay include the occurrence of a particular date, the passage of adesignated amount of time, execution of certain operations, or the like.

Executable code that causes execution of unauthorized processes maycause and/or creates unintentional consequents may create significantoperational impacts on the computing systems within a networkenvironment. Accordingly, an entity may wish to perform validation andsecurity testing of executable code (e.g., software applications,updates and patches, or the like) before the code is permitted to beexecuted and/or installed onto any of the entity's computing systems. Inthis regard, an entity's system may generate a virtual environmentinstance in which executable code may be tested and validated forexecution and/or installation. Once the executable code to be tested maybe opened within the virtual environment, the system may execute a setof operations or commands with respect to the executable code (e.g.,installing the application, using certain functions or features of theapplication, performing system processes, installing software updates,and the like).

The executable code may be tested within the virtual environment on anaccelerated time basis. In such an embodiment, rather than executingprocesses in real-time, the system may execute its processes within thevirtual environment on a faster than real-time scale. For example, theprocesses that would ordinarily be executed by a given computing systemacross one year may be executed by the system in minutes. The system mayadjust the accelerated time-based execution of its processes based onthe identity of the executable code to be validated. For instance, ifthe executable code is an application, the system may execute theprocesses that a user would execute with respect to the application(e.g., loading or unloading the application into/from the system memory,using the features of the application, inputting authenticationcredentials, or the like) along an extended timeframe.

In this way, the system may be able to detect issues or defects arisingfrom the executable code that, rather than being immediately detectable,may remain undetected until some point in the future. In an exemplaryembodiment, a set of executable code may comprise a logic bomb which maybe configured to execute its unauthorized payload (e.g., a wipe of allsystem memory and/or data storage, unauthorized encryption, or the like)at a predetermined point in the future (e.g., one week from the initialrun date, a specific date and time, or the like) or after certainconditions are met (e.g., the code is executed a certain number oftimes). In other embodiments, the executable code may have latent issueswith instability over longer timeframes (e.g., the application becomesless stable as the application cache approaches capacity). By executingsuch code within the virtual environment, the system may be able todetect the presence of such defects or issues that may not beimmediately detectable using conventional methods (e.g., anti-malwaredefinitions) while simultaneously ensuring that the defects or issuesaffect only the virtual environment rather than any of the computingsystems within the network, particularly those within the productionenvironment.

The system may generate a log of all actions performed within thevirtual environment along with the outcomes associated with the actionsperformed. For instance, such outcomes may include the discovery ofmalware, software incompatibilities, driver faults, operating systemerrors, application bugs and/or instability, or the like. If the systemdetects that executing the set of operations on the executable code hasnot caused any detrimental outcomes to appear, the system may validatethe executable code (e.g., determine that the executable code is safe toexecute). In some embodiments, validating the executable code may beconditional on certain factors (e.g., the executable code is validatedonly with respect to certain computing systems having a particularsoftware and/or hardware configuration). Once the executable code isvalidated, the system may input the executable code into a datatransformation algorithm to produce a data output. For instance, thedata transformation algorithm may be a hash algorithm such as SHA suchthat a hash output is generated from the executable code. The hashoutput associated with the executable code may then be stored in anauthorized/validated hash database.

Once the validated hash database is generated, new sets of executablecode may be hashed to produce new hash outputs. If the new hash outputmatches a hash stored within the validated hash database, the system mayrecognize the executable code as validated and thus authorize theinstallation and/or execution of the executable code. If no match isdetected, the system may require that the new executable code isevaluated within the virtual environment before it is permitted to beinstalled or executed. In some embodiments, the system may furthercomprise an unauthorized hash database comprising a list of executablecode that the system has determined to produce undesirable effects incomputing systems (e.g., the executable code contains malware, causesinstability or crashes, or the like). In such embodiments, if the hashof a particular set of executable code matches a hash found within theunauthorized hash database, the system may automatically block theinstallation and/or execution of the set of executable code. In thisway, the system may provide a secure way to perform validation testingof executable code that may reveal issues that may not be detectablebased on a line-by-line analysis of the code.

In some embodiments, the system may only allow validated executable codeto be installed and/or executed on certain designated computing systems.For example, certain executable code may only be validated to run oncomputing systems having specific hardware and/or softwareconfigurations (e.g., to avoid unforeseen compatibility issues). In suchembodiments, the system may generate hash outputs of the environment(e.g., computing system) in which the validated executable code is to beinstalled and/or executed (referred to herein as “environment hashes”).The environment hash may be generated using specified core informationabout such computing systems (e.g., operating system platform andversion, installed software, processor architecture, or the like). Theenvironment hash may then be stored within the validated hash database(or within an environment hash database).

Subsequently, before installing or executing a particular set ofexecutable code, computing systems may be required to not only generatea hash of the executable code for validation checking against the valueswithin the validated hash database, but may further be required togenerate an environment hash based on currently detected environmenthash variables for validation checking against the values within theenvironment hash database. If a mismatch is detected in the hash valuesof the executable code or of the environment (e.g., the computing systemhas experienced a core hardware or software change), the system mayprevent the execution of the executable code until the mismatch isremediated (e.g., the executable code and/or environment arere-validated and their respective hashes are updated within the hashdatabase).

An exemplary embodiment is provided as follows for illustrativepurposes. In one embodiment, an employee or third party contractor of anentity may be tasked with deploying a software update on the computingsystems within an onsite network. The software update may be stored, forinstance, on a portable flash memory drive held by the employee. In suchan embodiment, the system may comprise a designated computing system(e.g., a kiosk) which may be dedicated to running the virtualenvironment in which executable code is to be tested. In anotherembodiment, the virtual environment may be implemented on a portabledrive which may be connected to another computing system to generateinstances of the virtual environment on the computing system (e.g., thecomputing system to receive the update).

The employee may access the software update through the virtualenvironment (e.g., by connecting the portable drive containing theupdate to the kiosk). In some embodiments, the employee may select apredetermined set of operations to be executed with respect to thesoftware update (e.g., installation, troubleshooting, or the like). Inthis regard, the virtual environment may display a user interface of theoperating system on which the update is to be installed. In this regard,the virtual environment may simulate the exact hardware and/or softwareconfiguration of the computing systems on which the software update isto be deployed. In this way, the employee may go through a process ofinstalling the update within the virtual environment that is identicalto the process of installing the update on the target computing systems.In other embodiments, the system may automatically execute thepredetermined set of operations based on the identity of the executablecode to be tested, which may be determined according to file extensions,metadata, or the like. In such embodiments, the system may automaticallydetect the occurrence of any unauthorized or undetected activity duringthe testing process.

If such activity is detected by the system, the kiosk may providefeedback to the user indicating the presence of such activity. Forinstance, a display (e.g., a monitor, projector, or the like) of thekiosk may display an indication that the executable code is not safe torun (e.g., a red screen or a “NO GO” message). In response, the employeemay recognize that the update is not to be installed on any of thecomputing systems on site. On the other hand, if no undesirable activityis detected during testing or if the hash of the software update matchesa hash within the validated hash database, the kiosk may display anindication that the executable code is safe to run (e.g., a green screenor a “GO” message). In such scenarios, the employee may be confidentthat the software update may be deployed without incident. Uponcompletion of the validation process, the system may generate a hash ofthe tested code and store the hash within the validated hash database(or unauthorized hash database in some embodiments).

The system as described herein confers a number of technologicaladvantages over validation systems. For instance, by using a virtualenvironment, the system may provide a secure, isolated way of performingvalidation and safety testing of executable code before it is deployedon target computing systems (e.g., computers within a productionenvironment). Furthermore, maintaining a database of validated hashes(or unauthorized hashes) may allow an entity to maintain precise versioncontrol with respect to software that may be installed on its computingsystems.

Turning now to the figures, FIG. 1 illustrates an operating environment100 for a secure virtual environment system, in accordance with oneembodiment of the present disclosure. In particular, FIG. 1 illustratesa secure virtual environment device 106 that is operatively coupled, viaa network, to a target computing system 103 and a hash database system104. In such a configuration, the secure virtual environment device 106may, in some embodiments, transmit information to and/or receiveinformation from the target computing system 103 and/or the hashdatabase system 104. It should be understood that FIG. 1 illustratesonly an exemplary embodiment of the operating environment 100, and itwill be appreciated that one or more functions of the systems, devices,or servers as depicted in FIG. 1 may be combined into a single system,device, or server. For instance, the functions of the secure virtualenvironment device 106 and the hash database system 104 may be performedby a single computing system. Furthermore, a single system, device, orserver as depicted in FIG. 1 may represent multiple systems, devices, orservers. For instance, though the target computing system 103 isdepicted as a single unit, the operating environment may comprisemultiple target computing systems.

The network may be a system specific distributive network receiving anddistributing specific network feeds and identifying specific networkassociated triggers. The network may include one or more cellular radiotowers, antennae, cell sites, base stations, telephone networks, cloudnetworks, radio access networks (RAN), WiFi networks, or the like.Additionally, the network may also include a global area network (GAN),such as the Internet, a wide area network (WAN), a local area network(LAN), or any other type of network or combination of networks.Accordingly, the network may provide for wireline, wireless, or acombination wireline and wireless communication between devices on thenetwork.

As illustrated in FIG. 1, the secure virtual environment device 106 maybe a computing system that hosts the virtual environment and allows forthe testing of executable code as described elsewhere herein.Accordingly, the secure virtual environment device 106 may comprise acommunication device 152, a processing device 154, and a memory device156. The secure virtual environment device 106 may be a device such as anetworked server, desktop computer, terminal, kiosk, or any other typeof computing system as described herein. In other embodiments, thesecure virtual environment device 106 may be a portable storage devicesuch as a portable hard drive, flash memory drive, memory card, or thelike. As used herein, the term “processing device” generally includescircuitry used for implementing the communication and/or logic functionsof the particular system. For example, a processing device may include adigital signal processor device, a microprocessor device, and variousanalog-to-digital converters, digital-to-analog converters, and othersupport circuits and/or combinations of the foregoing. Control andsignal processing functions of the system are allocated between theseprocessing devices according to their respective capabilities. Theprocessing device may include functionality to operate one or moresoftware programs based on computer-readable instructions thereof, whichmay be stored in a memory device.

The processing device 154 may be operatively coupled to thecommunication device 152 and the memory device 156 such that theprocessing device 154 uses the communication device 152 to communicatewith the network and other devices on the network, such as, but notlimited to the target computing system 103 and the hash database system104. In this regard, the communication device 152 generally comprises amodem, antennae, WiFi or Ethernet adapter, radio transceiver, or otherdevice for communicating with other devices on the network.

The memory device 156 may have computer-readable instructions 160 storedthereon, which in one embodiment includes the computer-readableinstructions 160 of an virtual environment application 162 comprisingcomputer-executable program code which may instruct the processingdevice 154 to perform certain logic, data processing, and data storingfunctions of the application to accomplish the entity's objectives. Forinstance, the virtual environment application 162 may contain theinstructions needed to generate instances of the virtual environment forvalidation testing. In some embodiments, the memory device 156 includesdata storage 158 for storing data related to the system environment.

As further illustrated in FIG. 1, the operating environment 100 mayfurther comprise a target computing system 103 in operativecommunication with the secure virtual environment device 106. The targetcomputing system 103 may be a computing system that is operated by auser 101, such as an administrator, agent, or employee of the entity. Inother embodiments, the user 101 may be a user which is external to theentity, such as a customer or client of the entity. Accordingly, thetarget computing system 103 may be a device such as a desktop computer,laptop, IoT device, smartphone, tablet, single-board computer, or thelike. The target computing system 103 may comprise a user interfacecomprising one or more input devices (e.g., a keyboard, keypad,microphone, mouse, tracking device, biometric readers, capacitivesensors, or the like) and/or output devices (e.g., a display such as amonitor, projector, headset, touchscreen, and/or auditory output devicessuch as speakers, headphones, or the like).

The target computing system 103 may comprise a processing device 134operatively coupled to a communication device 132 and a memory device136 having data storage 138 and computer readable instructions 140stored thereon. The computer readable instructions 140 may comprise auser application 144 which may receive inputs from the user 101 andproduce outputs to the user 101. Accordingly, the user application 144may include an operating system, application suite, or the like. In someembodiments, instances of the virtual environment may be modeled basedon the target computing system 103 and the hardware and/or softwarefound therein.

The operating environment 100 may further comprise a hash databasesystem 104. The hash database system 104 may be a computing system thatmay store hashes of executable code tested within the virtualenvironment. Accordingly, the hash database system 104 may comprise aprocessing device 174 operatively coupled to a communication device 172and a memory device 176 comprising data storage 178 and computerreadable instructions 180. A hash database 182 (which may be referred toherein as an “authorization database”) may be stored within the datastorage 178 of the hash database system 104, where the hash database 182contains the hashes of executable code that has been tested. In someembodiments, the hash database 182 may be a validated or authorized hashdatabase which stores hashes of executable code that has been validated(e.g., code that has been determined by the system to be safe to installand/or run). In other embodiments, the hash database 182 may be (orfurther include) an unauthorized hash database which stores hashes ofexecutable code that is unauthorized (e.g., code that has beendetermined to produce undesirable effects) to be installed or executedon computing systems within the operating environment 100 (e.g., thetarget computing system 103). In embodiments in which the validatedhashes are tied to certain computing systems, the hash database 182 mayfurther comprise environment hashes of computing systems which have beenapproved to install and/or execute the executable code as defined by thesystem.

The communication devices as described herein may comprise a wirelesslocal area network (WLAN) such as WiFi based on the Institute ofElectrical and Electronics Engineers' (IEEE) 802.11 standards, Bluetoothshort-wavelength UHF radio waves in the ISM band from 2.4 to 2.485 GHzor other wireless access technology. Alternatively or in addition to thewireless interface, the computing systems may also include acommunication interface device that may be connected by a hardwireconnection to the resource distribution device. The interface device maycomprise a connector such as a USB, SATA, PATA, SAS or other dataconnector for transmitting data to and from the respective computingsystem.

The computing systems described herein may each further include aprocessing device communicably coupled to devices as a memory device,output devices, input devices, a network interface, a power source, aclock or other timer, a camera, a positioning system device, agyroscopic device, one or more chips, and the like.

In some embodiments, the computing systems may access one or moredatabases or datastores (not shown) to search for and/or retrieveinformation related to the service provided by the entity. The computingsystems may also access a memory and/or datastore local to the variouscomputing systems within the operating environment 100.

The processing devices as described herein may include functionality tooperate one or more software programs or applications, which may bestored in the memory device. For example, a processing device may becapable of operating a connectivity program, such as a web browserapplication. In this way, the computing systems may transmit and receiveweb content, such as, for example, product valuation, serviceagreements, location-based content, and/or other web page content,according to a Wireless Application Protocol (WAP), Hypertext TransferProtocol (HTTP), and/or the like.

A processing device may also be capable of operating applications. Theapplications may be downloaded from a server and stored in the memorydevice of the computing systems. Alternatively, the applications may bepre-installed and stored in a memory in a chip.

The chip may include the necessary circuitry to provide integrationwithin the devices depicted herein. Generally, the chip will includedata storage which may include data associated with the service that thecomputing systems may be communicably associated therewith. The chipand/or data storage may be an integrated circuit, a microprocessor, asystem-on-a-chip, a microcontroller, or the like. In this way, the chipmay include data storage. Of note, it will be apparent to those skilledin the art that the chip functionality may be incorporated within otherelements in the devices. For instance, the functionality of the chip maybe incorporated within the memory device and/or the processing device.In a particular embodiment, the functionality of the chip isincorporated in an element within the devices. Still further, the chipfunctionality may be included in a removable storage device such as anSD card or the like.

A processing device may be configured to use the network interface tocommunicate with one or more other devices on a network. In this regard,the network interface may include an antenna operatively coupled to atransmitter and a receiver (together a “transceiver”). The processingdevice may be configured to provide signals to and receive signals fromthe transmitter and receiver, respectively. The signals may includesignaling information in accordance with the air interface standard ofthe applicable cellular system of the wireless telephone network thatmay be part of the network. In this regard, the computing systems may beconfigured to operate with one or more air interface standards,communication protocols, modulation types, and access types. By way ofillustration, the devices may be configured to operate in accordancewith any of a number of first, second, third, fourth, and/orfifth-generation communication protocols and/or the like. For example,the computing systems may be configured to operate in accordance withsecond-generation (2G) wireless communication protocols IS-136 (timedivision multiple access (TDMA)), GSM (global system for mobilecommunication), and/or IS-95 (code division multiple access (CDMA)), orwith third-generation (3G) wireless communication protocols, such asUniversal Mobile Telecommunications System (UMTS), CDMA2000, widebandCDMA (WCDMA) and/or time division-synchronous CDMA (TD-SCDMA), withfourth-generation (4G) wireless communication protocols, withfifth-generation (5G) wireless communication protocols, or the like. Thedevices may also be configured to operate in accordance withnon-cellular communication mechanisms, such as via a wireless local areanetwork (WLAN) or other communication/data networks.

The network interface may also include an application interface in orderto allow a user or service provider to execute some or all of theabove-described processes. The application interface may have access tothe hardware, e.g., the transceiver, and software previously describedwith respect to the network interface. Furthermore, the applicationinterface may have the ability to connect to and communicate with anexternal data storage on a separate system within the network.

The devices may have an interface that includes user output devicesand/or input devices. The output devices may include a display (e.g., aliquid crystal display (LCD) or the like) and a speaker or other audiodevice, which are operatively coupled to the processing device. Theinput devices, which may allow the devices to receive data from a user,may include any of a number of devices allowing the devices to receivedata from a user, such as a keypad, keyboard, touch-screen, touchpad,microphone, mouse, joystick, other pointer device, button, soft key,and/or other input device(s).

The devices may further include a power source. Generally, the powersource is a device that supplies electrical energy to an electricalload. In some embodiment, power source may convert a form of energy suchas solar energy, chemical energy, mechanical energy, or the like toelectrical energy. Generally, the power source may be a battery, such asa lithium battery, a nickel-metal hydride battery, or the like, that isused for powering various circuits, e.g., the transceiver circuit, andother devices that are used to operate the devices. Alternatively, thepower source may be a power adapter that can connect a power supply froma power outlet to the devices. In such embodiments, a power adapter maybe classified as a power source “in” the devices.

As described above, the computing devices as shown in FIG. 1 may alsoinclude a memory device operatively coupled to the processing device. Asused herein, “memory” may include any computer readable mediumconfigured to store data, code, or other information. The memory devicemay include volatile memory, such as volatile Random Access Memory (RAM)including a cache area for the temporary storage of data. The memorydevice may also include non-volatile memory, which can be embeddedand/or may be removable. The non-volatile memory may additionally oralternatively include an electrically erasable programmable read-onlymemory (EEPROM), flash memory or the like.

The memory device may store any of a number of applications or programswhich comprise computer-executable instructions/code executed by theprocessing device to implement the functions of the devices describedherein.

The computing systems may further comprise a gyroscopic device. Thepositioning system, input device, and the gyroscopic device may be usedin correlation to identify phases within a service term.

Each computing system may also have a control system for controlling thephysical operation of the device. The control system may comprise one ormore sensors for detecting operating conditions of the variousmechanical and electrical systems that comprise the computing systems orof the environment in which the computing systems are used. The sensorsmay communicate with the processing device to provide feedback to theoperating systems of the device. The control system may also comprisemetering devices for measuring performance characteristics of thecomputing systems. The control system may also comprise controllers suchas programmable logic controllers (PLC), proportional integralderivative controllers (PID) or other machine controllers. The computingsystems may also comprise various electrical, mechanical, hydraulic orother systems that perform various functions of the computing systems.These systems may comprise, for example, electrical circuits, motors,compressors, or any system that enables functioning of the computingsystems.

FIG. 2 illustrates a process flow 200 for performing validation ofexecutable code using accelerated time-based process execution, inaccordance with some embodiments of the present disclosure. The process200 begins at block 201, where the system imports a set of executablecode into a virtual environment instance. The set of executable code maybe automatically imported by the system, for instance, when a computingsystem within the network environment attempts to execute or install theset of executable code. In other embodiments, the set of executable codemay be manually imported into the virtual environment by a user. Forinstance, in an exemplary embodiment, a user such as an employee of anentity may be tasked with installing a certain application on a numberof computing systems within the entity's network environment. The usermay be in control of a copy of the set of executable code which may bestored on a portable drive or, in other embodiments, a network drive.The user may load the set of executable code onto a dedicated validationkiosk configured to generate instances of the virtual environment. Inother embodiments, the virtual environment software may be included onthe portable drive such that virtual environment instances are generatedusing the computing systems on which the application is to be executedand/or installed (which may be referred to herein as “target computingsystem”).

The system may generate one instance of the virtual environment for eachset of executable code to be validated. Each instance of the virtualenvironment may simulate the hardware, software, operating system,drivers, libraries, and the like of target computing system. The virtualenvironment may further be separated physically and/or logically fromthe target computing system. In this way, the system allows for thesecure containment of the set of executable code such that theexecutable code may be evaluated without impacting the target computingsystems.

The process continues to block 202, where the system executes, withinthe virtual environment instance, one or more processes on the set ofexecutable code, wherein the one or more processes are executed on anaccelerated time basis. The one or more processes may be executed basedon the characteristics of the executable code (e.g., the executable codeis used in the manner in which the executable code is intended to beused). For instance, if the executable code is an application, the oneor more processes may include interacting with the application and/orusing certain functions of the application (e.g., interacting with UIelements, calling functions, or the like).

In another embodiment, if the executable code is an installation file(e.g., an application setup file), the one or more processes maycomprise performing installation using the installation file. In someembodiments, the one or more processes may include scanning theexecutable code using anti-malware software. By executing the one ormore processes, the system may detect latent issues or defects that mayoccur within the computing systems on which the executable code isexecuted or installed. For instance, the system may be able to detectthe existence of malware, software/hardware incompatibilities,application and/or system instability, latency issues, or the like.

In some embodiments, the system may use time-accelerated execution ofthe one or more processes. During the time-accelerated execution, thesystem may execute all of the processes (including background systemprocesses, malware scanning, interactions with and/or installation ofthe executable code, and the like) according to an accelerated timescale which may be faster than real time. For example, the system mayrun, in one minute of accelerated time, all of the processes that acomputing system would normally run within one real-time, month, oryear. By using time-accelerated process execution, the system may beable to expediently and efficiently detect issues that may arise overthe passage of time (e.g., logic bombs, date/time issues,incompatibilities, or the like) that may not be immediately evident on ashort timeline.

In some embodiments, the system may select the timeframe in which toexecute the processes based on the identity of the executable code(e.g., based on the expected timeframe in which underlying issues mayappear). For example, the system may determine that the executable codehas a high probability of containing a time-activated logic bomb. Insuch an embodiment, the system may adjust the timeframe of the processexecution according to the expected activation date of the logic bomb.For instance, if the system determines that the logic bomb has thehighest probability of activating within 5 years, the system may adjustthe timeframe of the validation process to 5 years. Using theaccelerated time-based process execution, the system may be able toobtain an expedient projection of how the executable code would react ifit were used for such a duration. In other embodiments, the system maydetermine that the executable code has a high probability of containinga memory leak which may degrade performance of the application as it isused throughout the course of a day. In such embodiments, the system mayadjust the timeframe of the accelerated time-based process execution to1 day.

The process continues to block 203, where the system, based on executingthe one or more processes, performs validation of the set of executablecode. The system may maintain a log of all actions taken while executingthe one or more processes on the set of executable code. Accordingly,the system may perform validation of the executable code based on theactions taken within the virtual environment instance. In someembodiments, the system may detect no issues with the executable codeafter executing the one or more processes. In such embodiments,validating the executable code may comprise determining that theexecutable code is safe to install and/or execute.

In some embodiments, the system may be configured to display a positiveindicator on a graphical user interface which represents the system'sfinding that the executable code is safe and authorized to beinstalled/executed on the target computing system. For example, inembodiments in which the virtual environment is hosted on a dedicatedkiosk, the display device (e.g., monitor, screen, projector, or thelike) may display the positive indicator (e.g., affirmative text such as“safe” or “go,” a green background, or the like) to notify the user thatthe executable code may be safely installed and/or executed on thetarget computing systems.

In other embodiments, the system may detect one or more issues arisingfrom the actions performed on the executable code within the virtualenvironment. In such embodiments, validating the executable code maycomprise determining that the executable code is not safe to installand/or execute. Accordingly, the system may display a negative indicator(e.g., negative text such as “unsafe” or “no go,” a red background, orthe like) on the display device to indicate to the user that theexecutable code is not authorized to be installed and/or executed on thetarget computing systems. In this way, the user may be able to tell at aglance whether a given set of executable code is authorized to beexecuted or installed on the target computing systems. Once theexecutable code has been evaluated, the system may delete the virtualenvironment instance.

The process continues to block 204, where the system processes the setof executable code using a data transformation algorithm to generate adata transformation output. Once the executable code has been validated,the system may use the data transformation algorithm to generate a datatransformation output which is uniquely associated with the executablecode. In some embodiments, the data transformation algorithm may be acryptographic hash algorithm (e.g., SHA, MD5, or the like) which may beused to generate a hash output which may reflect the exact state of theexecutable code as it was evaluated. Even a 1-bit deviation from thestate of the executable code may result in a different hash output.Accordingly, once the hash output associated with a particular set ofexecutable code is generated, the hash output may be subsequently usedfor validation of other instances of executable code encountered by thesystem.

The process concludes at block 205, where the system stores the datatransformation output in an authorization database. In some embodiments,the authorization database may be an authorized hash database which maycomprise hash values of all of the sets of executable code which havebeen evaluated in the virtual environment and has been validated as“safe” by the system. Accordingly, if a given set of executable code isprocessed using a hash algorithm and produces a hash output whichmatches a hash value within the authorized hash database, the systemand/or the user may be able to identify the such a set of executablecode as being safe to execute or install without the need to re-evaluatethe executable code within the virtual environment. In this way, thesystem may be able to avoid unnecessary duplication of validationprocesses.

In some embodiments, the authorization database may further comprisehash values of executable code generated by third party computingsystems. In this regard, third parties other than the entity may performthe validation process of executable code as described herein togenerate hash outputs of the validated (e.g., “safe”) executable code,where the third party may have, for instance, an information-sharingrelationship with the entity. In such embodiments, the system may beconfigured to import hash output values from a third party computingsystem (e.g., a hash database server owned and/or operated by the thirdparty) and incorporate the hash output values into the authorized hashdatabase. In this way, the system may be able to efficiently control theexecution of executable code within its network environment withoutexpending computing resources unnecessarily by retesting the executablecode.

In other embodiments, the authorization database may be an unauthorizedhash database which may comprise hash values of executable code whichhas been evaluated within the virtual environment and has been deemed bythe system to be unsafe (e.g., the executable code contains malware). Inthis regard, the system may use the hash values within the unauthorizedhash database to positively identify executable code which has beendeemed unsafe by the system. Accordingly, if the hash values of anygiven set of executable code match those found within the unauthorizedhash database, the system may automatically block the installationand/or execution of such executable code.

FIG. 3 illustrates a process flow 300 for validating executable codeusing an authorization database, in accordance with some embodiments ofthe present disclosure. The process begins at block 301, where thesystem receives a request from a user to execute a second set ofexecutable code. In an exemplary embodiment, the system may receive arequest to validate the second set of executable code after theauthorization database has been generated. Accordingly, the second setof executable code may be, for instance, an installation program that auser wishes to install on a particular target computing system. In someembodiments, the user may attempt to validate the second set ofexecutable code using a dedicated kiosk. In other embodiments, thetarget computing system may, at least in part, execute the processes asdescribed below.

The process continues to block 302, where the system processes thesecond set of executable code using the data transformation algorithm togenerate a second data transformation output. Continuing the aboveexamples, the system may process the second set of executable code usingthe same hash algorithm as the one used to generate the hashes withinthe authorization database. For instance, if the authorization databasecontains hash values generated using the SHA algorithm, the system mayuse the same algorithm (i.e., SHA) to process the second set ofexecutable code to generate a second hash output.

The process continues to block 303, where the system compares the seconddata transformation output to one or more entries in the authorizationdatabase. Once the second hash output is generated, the system maycompare the value of the second hash output with the values within theauthorization database. The authorization database may contain hashvalues for executable code in the exact state in which the executablecode existed at the time of evaluation by the system within the virtualenvironment. Accordingly, different versions of the same software (e.g.,version 1.02 version 1.01 of a productivity application) will havedifferent hash values such that each version of the software isevaluated separately in the virtual environment before being authorizedfor use and/or installation on the target computing systems.

The process concludes at block 304, where the system validates thesecond data transformation output based on comparing the second datatransformation output with the one or more entries in the authorizationdatabase. The authorization database may be an authorized hash databasewhich may contain hash values for sets of executable code that may havebeen evaluated and deemed by the system to be safe. In such anembodiment, if the hash value for any given set of executable codematches a value found within the authorized hash database, then the setof executable code may be authorized to be installed and/or executedwithout going through the process of evaluating the executable codewithin the virtual environment. If a match is not found, the system maydetermine that the executable code must be validated by the system.Accordingly, in such embodiments, the system may generate a new virtualenvironment instance and run through the validation process as detailedabove.

In other embodiments, the authorization database may be an unauthorizedhash database which may contain hash values for executable code which isexplicitly unauthorized to be installed or executed by the system. Insuch embodiments, if the hash value of executable code matches a valuefound within the unauthorized hash database, the system mayautomatically block/deny the execution/installation of the executablecode. In this way, the system may provide an efficient and secure way tocontrol application installation and usage within the networkenvironment.

Each communication interface described herein generally includeshardware, and, in some instances, software, that enables the computersystem, to transport, send, receive, and/or otherwise communicateinformation to and/or from the communication interface of one or moreother systems on the network. For example, the communication interfaceof the user input system may include a wireless transceiver, modem,server, electrical connection, and/or other electronic device thatoperatively connects the user input system to another system. Thewireless transceiver may include a radio circuit to enable wirelesstransmission and reception of information.

As will be appreciated by one of ordinary skill in the art, the presentinvention may be embodied as an apparatus (including, for example, asystem, a machine, a device, a computer program product, and/or thelike), as a method (including, for example, a business process, acomputer-implemented process, and/or the like), or as any combination ofthe foregoing. Accordingly, embodiments of the present invention maytake the form of an entirely software embodiment (including firmware,resident software, micro-code, and the like), an entirely hardwareembodiment, or an embodiment combining software and hardware aspectsthat may generally be referred to herein as a “system.” Furthermore,embodiments of the present invention may take the form of a computerprogram product that includes a computer-readable storage medium havingcomputer-executable program code portions stored therein.

As the phrase is used herein, a processor may be “configured to” performa certain function in a variety of ways, including, for example, byhaving one or more general-purpose circuits perform the function byexecuting particular computer-executable program code embodied incomputer-readable medium, and/or by having one or moreapplication-specific circuits perform the function.

It will be understood that any suitable computer-readable medium may beutilized. The computer-readable medium may include, but is not limitedto, a non-transitory computer-readable medium, such as a tangibleelectronic, magnetic, optical, infrared, electromagnetic, and/orsemiconductor system, apparatus, and/or device. For example, in someembodiments, the non-transitory computer-readable medium includes atangible medium such as a portable computer diskette, a hard disk, arandom access memory (RAM), a read-only memory (ROM), an erasableprogrammable read-only memory (EEPROM or Flash memory), a compact discread-only memory (CD-ROM), and/or some other tangible optical and/ormagnetic storage device. In other embodiments of the present invention,however, the computer-readable medium may be transitory, such as apropagation signal including computer-executable program code portionsembodied therein.

It will also be understood that one or more computer-executable programcode portions for carrying out the specialized operations of the presentinvention may be required on the specialized computer includeobject-oriented, scripted, and/or unscripted programming languages, suchas, for example, Java, Perl, Smalltalk, C++, SAS, SQL, Python, ObjectiveC, and/or the like. In some embodiments, the one or morecomputer-executable program code portions for carrying out operations ofembodiments of the present invention are written in conventionalprocedural programming languages, such as the “C” programming languagesand/or similar programming languages. The computer program code mayalternatively or additionally be written in one or more multi-paradigmprogramming languages, such as, for example, F #.

Embodiments of the present invention are described above with referenceto flowcharts and/or block diagrams. It will be understood that steps ofthe processes described herein may be performed in orders different thanthose illustrated in the flowcharts. In other words, the processesrepresented by the blocks of a flowchart may, in some embodiments, be inperformed in an order other that the order illustrated, may be combinedor divided, or may be performed simultaneously. It will also beunderstood that the blocks of the block diagrams illustrated, in someembodiments, merely conceptual delineations between systems and one ormore of the systems illustrated by a block in the block diagrams may becombined or share hardware and/or software with another one or more ofthe systems illustrated by a block in the block diagrams. Likewise, adevice, system, apparatus, and/or the like may be made up of one or moredevices, systems, apparatuses, and/or the like. For example, where aprocessor is illustrated or described herein, the processor may be madeup of a plurality of microprocessors or other processing devices whichmay or may not be coupled to one another. Likewise, where a memory isillustrated or described herein, the memory may be made up of aplurality of memory devices which may or may not be coupled to oneanother.

It will also be understood that the one or more computer-executableprogram code portions may be stored in a transitory or non-transitorycomputer-readable medium (e.g., a memory, and the like) that can directa computer and/or other programmable data processing apparatus tofunction in a particular manner, such that the computer-executableprogram code portions stored in the computer-readable medium produce anarticle of manufacture, including instruction mechanisms which implementthe steps and/or functions specified in the flowchart(s) and/or blockdiagram block(s).

The one or more computer-executable program code portions may also beloaded onto a computer and/or other programmable data processingapparatus to cause a series of operational steps to be performed on thecomputer and/or other programmable apparatus. In some embodiments, thisproduces a computer-implemented process such that the one or morecomputer-executable program code portions which execute on the computerand/or other programmable apparatus provide operational steps toimplement the steps specified in the flowchart(s) and/or the functionsspecified in the block diagram block(s). Alternatively,computer-implemented steps may be combined with operator and/orhuman-implemented steps in order to carry out an embodiment of thepresent invention.

While certain exemplary embodiments have been described and shown in theaccompanying drawings, it is to be understood that such embodiments aremerely illustrative of, and not restrictive on, the broad invention, andthat this invention not be limited to the specific constructions andarrangements shown and described, since various other changes,combinations, omissions, modifications and substitutions, in addition tothose set forth in the above paragraphs, are possible. Those skilled inthe art will appreciate that various adaptations and modifications ofthe just described embodiments can be configured without departing fromthe scope and spirit of the invention. Therefore, it is to be understoodthat, within the scope of the appended claims, the invention may bepracticed other than as specifically described herein.

INCORPORATION BY REFERENCE

To supplement the present disclosure, this application furtherincorporates entirely by reference the following commonly assignedpatent applications:

U.S. patent application Docket Number Ser. No. Title Filed On9664US1.014033.3705 To be assigned VIRTUAL ENVIRONMENT ConcurrentlySYSTEM FOR SECURE herewith EXECUTION OF PROGRAM CODE USING CRYPTOGRAPHICHASHES 9727US1.014033.3714 To be assigned SYSTEM FOR ANALYSISConcurrently AND AUTHORIZATION FOR herewith USE OF EXECUTABLEENVIRONMENT DATA IN A COMPUTING SYSTEM USING HASH OUTPUTS9730US1.014033.3716 To be assigned SYSTEM FOR PREVENTION Concurrently OFUNAUTHORIZED herewith ACCESS USING AUTHORIZED ENVIRONMENT HASH OUTPUTS9731US1.014033.3717 To be assigned SYSTEM FOR NETWORK ConcurrentlyISOLATION OF AFFECTED herewith COMPUTING SYSTEMS USING ENVIRONMENT HASHOUTPUTS

What is claimed is:
 1. A system for secure execution of program codewithin a virtual environment using accelerated time-based processexecution, the system comprising: a memory device with computer-readableprogram code stored thereon; a communication device; and a processingdevice operatively coupled to the memory device and the communicationdevice, wherein the processing device is configured to execute thecomputer-readable program code to: import a set of executable code intoa virtual environment instance; execute, within the virtual environmentinstance, one or more processes on the set of executable code, whereinthe one or more processes are executed on an accelerated time basis;based on executing the one or more processes, perform validation of theset of executable code; process the set of executable code using a datatransformation algorithm to generate a data transformation output; storethe data transformation output in an authorization database; receive arequest from a user to execute a second set of executable code; processthe second set of executable code using the data transformationalgorithm to generate a second data transformation output; compare thesecond data transformation output to one or more entries in theauthorization database; and validate the second data transformationoutput based on comparing the second data transformation output with theone or more entries in the authorization database.
 2. The systemaccording to claim 1, wherein executing the one or more processes on theaccelerated time basis comprises: determining an expected timeframe ofan undetected issue within the set of executable code; and adjust atimeframe of executing the one or more processes based on the expectedtimeframe of the undetected issue.
 3. The system according to claim 2,wherein the undetected issue is a logic bomb.
 4. The system according toclaim 1, wherein the authorization database is an authorized hashdatabase, wherein comparing the second data transformation output to oneor more entries in the authorization database comprises: detecting amatch between the second data transformation output and a cryptographichash value within the one or more entries in the authorization database;and based on detecting the match, authorizing execution of the secondset of executable code on a target computing system.
 5. The systemaccording to claim 4, wherein the computer-readable program code furthercauses the processing device to display a positive indicator to a uservia a user interface, wherein the positive indicator indicates that thesecond set of executable code is authorized to be executed on the targetcomputing system.
 6. The system according to claim 1, wherein theauthorization database is an authorized hash database, wherein comparingthe second data transformation output to one or more entries in theauthorization database comprises: determining that the second datatransformation output does not match any of the one or more entries inthe authorization database; and automatically blocking execution of thesecond set of executable code on a target computing system.
 7. Acomputer program product for secure execution of program code within avirtual environment using accelerated time-based process execution, thecomputer program product comprising at least one non-transitory computerreadable medium having computer-readable program code portions embodiedtherein, the computer-readable program code portions comprisingexecutable code portions for: importing a set of executable code into avirtual environment instance; executing, within the virtual environmentinstance, one or more processes on the set of executable code, whereinthe one or more processes are executed on an accelerated time basis;based on executing the one or more processes, performing validation ofthe set of executable code; processing the set of executable code usinga data transformation algorithm to generate a data transformationoutput; storing the data transformation output in an authorizationdatabase; receiving a request from a user to execute a second set ofexecutable code; processing the second set of executable code using thedata transformation algorithm to generate a second data transformationoutput; comparing the second data transformation output to one or moreentries in the authorization database; and validating the second datatransformation output based on comparing the second data transformationoutput with the one or more entries in the authorization database. 8.The computer program product according to claim 7, wherein executing theone or more processes on the accelerated time basis comprises:determining an expected timeframe of an undetected issue within the setof executable code; and adjust a timeframe of executing the one or moreprocesses based on the expected timeframe of the undetected issue. 9.The computer program product according to claim 8, wherein theundetected issue is a logic bomb.
 10. The computer program productaccording to claim 7, wherein the authorization database is anauthorized hash database, wherein comparing the second datatransformation output to one or more entries in the authorizationdatabase comprises: detecting a match between the second datatransformation output and a cryptographic hash value within the one ormore entries in the authorization database; and based on detecting thematch, authorizing execution of the second set of executable code on atarget computing system.
 11. The computer program product according toclaim 10, the computer-readable program code portions further comprisingan executable code portion for displaying a positive indicator to a uservia a user interface, wherein the positive indicator indicates that thesecond set of executable code is authorized to be executed on the targetcomputing system.
 12. A computer-implemented method for secure executionof program code within a virtual environment using acceleratedtime-based process execution, wherein the computer-implemented methodcomprises: importing a set of executable code into a virtual environmentinstance; executing, within the virtual environment instance, one ormore processes on the set of executable code, wherein the one or moreprocesses are executed on an accelerated time basis; based on executingthe one or more processes, performing validation of the set ofexecutable code; processing the set of executable code using a datatransformation algorithm to generate a data transformation output; andstoring the data transformation output in an authorization databases;receiving a request from a user to execute a second set of executablecode; processing the second set of executable code using the datatransformation algorithm to generate a second data transformationoutput; comparing the second data transformation output to one or moreentries in the authorization database; and validating the second datatransformation output based on comparing the second data transformationoutput with the one or more entries in the authorization database. 13.The computer-implemented method according to claim 12, wherein executingthe one or more processes on the accelerated time basis comprises:determining an expected timeframe of an undetected issue within the setof executable code; and adjust a timeframe of executing the one or moreprocesses based on the expected timeframe of the undetected issue. 14.The computer-implemented method according to claim 13, wherein theundetected issue is a logic bomb.
 15. The computer-implemented methodaccording to claim 12, wherein the authorization database is anauthorized hash database, wherein comparing the second datatransformation output to one or more entries in the authorizationdatabase comprises: detecting a match between the second datatransformation output and a cryptographic hash value within the one ormore entries in the authorization database; and based on detecting thematch, authorizing execution of the second set of executable code on atarget computing system.
 16. The computer-implemented method accordingto claim 15, the method further comprising displaying a positiveindicator to a user via a user interface, wherein the positive indicatorindicates that the second set of executable code is authorized to beexecuted on the target computing system.
 17. The computer-implementedmethod according to claim 12, wherein the authorization database is anauthorized hash database, wherein comparing the second datatransformation output to one or more entries in the authorizationdatabase comprises: determining that the second data transformationoutput does not match any of the one or more entries in theauthorization database; and automatically blocking execution of thesecond set of executable code on a target computing system.